Macx dvd ripper pro high cpu usage install#
Macx dvd ripper pro high cpu usage mac#
Macx dvd ripper pro high cpu usage windows#

With a 24 core CPU you really want to be smart in utilising that core count to the fullest.ġ00 empty tracks, 1 instance of Fabilter Pro-R in each one, so 100 instances. This means that the more you load each channel the less S1 can spread across cores. I'm not 100% on the subject, but i'm sure that each channel/track process can only occur on a single core. Use Resource Monitor for this task and set the CPU thread view to small:. Only takes 5 minutes to test and it will provide confidence that all is running as you'd expect. If it were me, Next i'd duplicate tracks in lots of 25 each with a single plugin and see if Studio One spreads across all 24 cores/48 threads correctly as you keep duplicating into the 200-300 track count range. And also the main question that the OP had on the subject. So that's the first question answered, at least from the way i'd approach this issue. I've never had to compare, but as it's only showing the highest single core usage on S1 there's not going to be much relevance vs the total CPU usage.

Macx dvd ripper pro high cpu usage windows#

Which I’ll answer with a question- what is the load on your highest loaded core in Windows Task Manager when this is happening, and how does that compare to the Activity/CPU Monitor within Studio One. This also aligns with the same behaviour as their Intel CPU had around the same single core performance.

So that means they could be overloading a core then - which goes back to arranging a project more efficiently as being a potential fix. There are many Knowledge Base articles on this because most people assume it’s their whole computer.Īhh, brilliant thanks for confirming that. Robertgra圓 wroteIt shows the highest loaded core.

Macx dvd ripper pro high cpu usage install#

So, wearing a fault finding hat i'd keep things very simple and ask why the huge disparity between windows task manager and what the S1 performance monitor displays? Until you get over that hurdle it's pointless/confusing people saying change audio interfaces, optimise your install etc. And a beastly 24 core one (48 threads) with the same single core performance as their previous CPU. If it was a laptop then you'd consider things like performance and power saving settings could play a part, but that is a desktop CPU. For me, that's something that support can confirm for them unless someone is equipped here with that knowledge? Anyone know 'for sure' without guessing? I'm also presuming this isn't intermittent but a consistent issue.īut, i really don't know what that S1 CPU meter reflects, someone did previously mention it's the highest usage that a single core shows. It's almost as though Studio One isn't utilising those cores. If Windows is saying 12% of the CPU is in use, and S1 is reporting 70% usage that's a large disparity and why they need support to explain why it exists. And this also occured on a previous system - different chipset, cpu, motherboard etc.

Macx dvd ripper pro high cpu usage mac#

There are people in the forum with Ryzens who are getting good results, so it's likely something else.īecause they have checked task manager (Activity monitor in mac world) from a system/os level and there is 80+% capacity there, which means nothing else has the CPU. Why's that? I think operating system/cpu settings and conflicting applications are much more likely than some nebulous thing that only Presonus can fix. Robertgra圓 wrote leonseaman wroteit's more likely to be a setting in S1 which is failing to utilise his CPU cores